ChevelleForum.net

Go Back   Chevrolet Chevelle Forums > Chevrolet Chevelle Garage > Chevelle Suspension & Chassis

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-31-2009, 07:50 AM
Hank70SS's Avatar
Hank70SS Hank70SS is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Brighton, MI
Posts: 4,719
Default Derek, come back in here

So I asked in the other thread about the tall ball joints to improve handling. If I read the post correctly that's a good option that doesn't require a lot of mods. I can live with a 1/2" drop in the front, just don't want to alter the stock stance too much. So are they worth the investment, cost vs handling improvement.

Thanks
__________________
Hank

70 Chevelle SS396(454), M20, 3.73
My Chevelle
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-31-2009, 11:47 AM
Derek69SS's Avatar
Derek69SS Derek69SS is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Mantorville, MN
Posts: 773
Default

Tall balljoints are an excellent improvement, but I would recomend aftermarket upper A-arms in order to get a decent alignment... with stock upper arms, you really can't get enough positive caster, even with stock parts. With a bigblock, you might not even have enough room to shim the stock A-arms in for proper camber setting either. You could do one end (uppers or lowers) with stock arms for a small improvement, but if you want really good geometry, you'll need to do both.

Howe Precision are the premium quality modular/rebuildable tall balljoints, but at $85/ea you're looking at $340 just for balljoints. http://www.scandc.com/balljoints.htm

Recently Power Performance started producing a tall balljoint also. These are not modular/rebuildable, but they appear to be a very good quality product for significantly less money. At $50/ea, they're quite a bit more affordable. http://www.powerperformancemotorspor...?categoryId=29

The best value in aftermarket upper arms is the SPC adjustable arms, at $319/pr http://www.scandc.com/spcarms.htm

The big improvement is that they change the camber curve, which increases cornering grip by a LOT, as you use the whole tire contact patch instead of just the outside edge. Another benefit is the raised roll-center height, which means you get less body roll. Also, the steer arm moves up in relation to the lower balljoint, so bumpsteer is reduced by about 85% from stock.

With the big increase in front grip, you'll want to take the car out afterward in a big open parking lot and find its limits... Depending on the rest of your suspension setup, you may find that the front now has more grip than the rear, which can be dangerous in a panic stop/evasive situation... This is a big change in overall grip, so some tuning with sway-bars or springs may be required to correct the balance.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-31-2009, 01:53 PM
Hank70SS's Avatar
Hank70SS Hank70SS is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Brighton, MI
Posts: 4,719
Default

Thanks Derek, that was very helpful. Sounds like I should wait on the ball joints until I can afford to do the arms too. Thanks again.
__________________
Hank

70 Chevelle SS396(454), M20, 3.73
My Chevelle
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-10-2010, 12:30 PM
Cameano Cameano is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 36
Default

Derek, now that I'm actively thinking about it, the upper arm really needs to be shortened to pull the top of the spindle in on the tall spindles, correct? This is what the aftermarket arms are doing for you, so you don't have to shim as much. I'm just thinking out loud, because I know of a certain street stocker that had widened stock arms back in the 90's that was a class champion on a certain dirt track. I saw all the parts involved when they were removed prior to sale of said car.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-11-2010, 12:07 PM
Derek69SS's Avatar
Derek69SS Derek69SS is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Mantorville, MN
Posts: 773
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cameano View Post
Derek, now that I'm actively thinking about it, the upper arm really needs to be shortened to pull the top of the spindle in on the tall spindles, correct? This is what the aftermarket arms are doing for you, so you don't have to shim as much. I'm just thinking out loud, because I know of a certain street stocker that had widened stock arms back in the 90's that was a class champion on a certain dirt track. I saw all the parts involved when they were removed prior to sale of said car.
Yeah, narrowing stock uppers (or widening stock lowers would be even better) would do the trick for getting the alignment, but the surface that the balljoint mounts to is at a very steep angle also. With a good hard bump, there's a good chance the balljoint would reach its pivot limit before the lower hits the bumpstop.

Aftermarket uppers for tall spindles (or tall balljoints) have the balljoint mounted perpendicular to the arms with a flat plate.
__________________
Derek Kiefer, member of Minnesota's Northstar Chevelle Club
69 Malibu Pro-Touring - 69 SS396 3spd - 23 Model T roadster pickup
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:27 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Audiokarma.org